Saturday, August 27, 2011

Government “sees sense” on health and safety myth-making

Amplify’d from www.shponline.co.uk
SHP Online





Government “sees sense” on health and safety myth-making

24 August 2011

An epidemic of excuses wrongly citing health and safety is needlessly curtailing people’s personal freedoms, Employment minister Chris Grayling announced today (24 August).
 
In what has been described as the Government finally “seeing sense” the minister conceded that it is misconceptions about and misapplication of health and safety legislation – rather than the laws themselves, or health and safety professionals – that have contributed to its negative image.
 
Speaking after the publication by the HSE on its website of the top ten most bizarre health and safety bans – including the closure of Murray Mount during this year’s Wimbledon Championships – Mr Grayling said:  “We have seen an epidemic of excuses wrongly citing health and safety as a reason to prevent people from doing pretty harmless things with only very minor risks attached. This has to stop. The law does not require this to happen – people must be encouraged to use their common sense.



“Health and safety laws exist to provide important safeguards against people being seriously injured, or made unwell at work and should not hamper everyday activities. These regulations are intended to save lives, not stop them.”
 
The minister went on to blame “middle managers in councils and companies [hiding] unpopular decisions behind health and safety legislation” for diluting common sense and urged people to challenge such dubious decisions, wherever possible.
 
His statement comes a week after the prime minster, David Cameron, also acknowledged that health and safety rules are often “lazily trotted out” to justify all sorts of wrong-headed actions.
 
IOSH was delighted that the Government has “seen sense”, saying it represented “a genuine success for the Institution’s campaign of lobbying”. Added its head of policy and public affairs, Richard Jones: “We’re delighted that the Government has listened and is joining our fight to tackle the health and safety myths that have sadly tarnished real health and safety.


“We think this statement by the minister represents an important watershed in putting the record straight about real health and safety – highlighting that it’s only when it’s misinterpreted and misapplied that there are problems.

“Good health and safety is about saving lives, supporting business and enterprise, and sustaining the economy. We think better education and government promotion of the sensible steps the law really requires should help debunk all this nonsense once and for all.”
 
The Hazards Campaign said Mr Grayling’s stance “undermines the whole basis for his attacks on workplace health and safety” and called on him and the Government to “come clean” and admit their “previous attacks on workplace health and safety provisions are based on ideology rather than the cost of health and safety failures to society, and who is responsible”.

The TUC agreed, with general secretary Brendan Barber saying "the problem is not employers using health and safety as an excuse but the government using myths like this as a reason for cutting back on regulation, enforcement and guidance”.
 
To read more stories publicised in the national media of decisions taken on dubious health and safety grounds, visit SHP’s ‘elf and safety watch’ section here.

Read more at www.shponline.co.uk
 

Wednesday, August 24, 2011

BBC News - Health and safety 'excuse' for unpopular decisions

Is this the start of the realisation that overzealous jobsworths use H&S as a shield for their fears of litigation?

Amplify’d from www.bbc.co.uk

Health and safety 'excuse' for unpopular decisions

Councils and companies are using health and safety rules as an excuse to make "unpopular decisions" banning low-risk activities, a watchdog says.

The Health and Safety Executive has published a list of what it says were the 10 most "bizarre bans" on health and safety grounds over the past year.

They include bans on kite flying on a beach, sack races for children and pins used to secure commemorative poppies.

Spectators watching a match on the big screen at Wimbledon
This summer's decision to turn off the big screen at Wimbledon's "Henman Hill" caused a row

But experts have warned of many cases where risks are underappreciated.

The HSE said complying with health and safety regulations was often used as a "convenient excuse" for organisations to justify unnecessary decisions.

Among examples on its list were a school's decision to ban football games unless the ball was made of sponge, and a ban on street parties to mark the royal wedding in April.

'Undermining confidence'

The most high-profile case it cites was the decision by the Wimbledon tennis authorities to stop showing television coverage of a key game on a big screen on "Henman Hill" - a popular vantage point where crowds have congregated for years to watch matches.

The decision, taken because of concerns about safety conditions after hours of heavy rain and poor visibility, led to a row between the watchdog and organisers The All England Lawn Tennis Club.

The HSE also questioned the rules for dodgem rides after reports in April that Butlins had banned people bumping into each other at its Skegness holiday camp on health and safety grounds.

At the time, ministers cited the case as evidence that regulations were being wrongly applied, saying it had no basis under current laws and they were "disappointed" by the decision.

The HSE said such cases "started to undermine people's confidence in health and safety law and the work it does to protect people at work from serious risk".

While there were a clear set of laws regulating health and safety in the workplace, it said "what other people choose to see as health and safety is quite vague and ill-defined".

'Safe environment'

The All England Lawn Tennis Club said it had acted on the advice of its own safety officials, based on their assessment of the risks caused by conditions and crowd numbers on one particular evening.

"The term health and safety gets bandied about but it (the decision) was nothing to do with health," a spokesman said. "It was entirely to do with safety and the personal risks from a specific set of circumstances at a specific time.

"It was not a blanket decision that every time we get rain we are going to shut it down."

And Butlins said there had been "no change" to the way it ran its dodgem rides.

"Like most operators of dodgems we decided long ago that a 'no deliberate bumping' policy means that everyone - even our youngest riders - can enjoy a fun experience in a safe environment," a company spokeswoman said.

"This is not a response to legislation but ensures that all our families enjoy their time at our resort."

An independent review of current health and safety legislation in the UK is due to report in October, with ministers keen to consolidate or simplify existing regulations.

'Harmless things'

In response to the HSE report, employment minister Chris Grayling said members of the public should "challenge health and safety myths" and overzealous practices.

"We have seen an epidemic of excuses wrongly citing health and safety as a reason to prevent people from doing pretty harmless things with only very minor risks attached," he said.

"This has to stop. The law does not require this to happen - people must be encouraged to use their common sense."

One health and safety expert said the law required people to approach risks in a balanced and proportionate manner.

"Overzealousness about trivial risks gives health and safety a bad name but there are actually many more cases where people are under-hitting," said Roger Bibbings, occupational safety adviser for the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents.

Good health and safety practice was all about "exercising judgement", he added.

"People in authority such as councillors and managers need to be much more 'risk literate' or 'risk intelligent'. And third partiers such as clients, funders or insurers need to avoid requiring people to do things in the name of 'elf 'n' safety' which are not actually required by the law."

Top 10 'bizarre bans'

  • Wimbledon's "Henman Hill" closed because it was wet
  • Dodgem cars bumping into each other at Butlins in Skegness
  • Royal wedding street parties
  • Removal of an unwanted TV from a pensioner's home for recycling
  • Carnivals with fancy dress parades
  • Kite flying on a popular tourist beach in east Yorkshire
  • Pupils playing on playground monkey bars in Oxfordshire
  • Using pins to secure commemorative poppies
  • School football games - unless the ball is made of sponge
  • Children taking part in a sack race on sports day

Source: Health and Safety Executive

Read more at www.bbc.co.uk
 

Monday, August 01, 2011

Health and Safety for Beginners Prize Draw July Winners – did you win?

Gordon Williams, wins a Kindle 3G; Stephen Bates and Liann Lennon both win a NEBOSH Certificate course and Yasmeen Hirani wins a copy of Essentials of H&S at Work - congratulations all :)

Health and Safety for Beginners

Health and Safety for Beginners Prize Draw July Winners – did you win?

2011 prize draw is here! Here are this month’s winners! Check your inbox for your winning email.

>>>>


Health and Safety for Beginners


Gordon Williams - winner of one of Amazon’s Kindle 3G’s donated by Health and Safety for Beginners


  


>>>>


SHEilds Ltd


Stephen Bates - One NEBOSH Certificate (eLearning) with the training providerSHEilds Ltd. What’s even better is you get to choose which certificate you want to study!


>>>>


Wise Global Training Ltd


Liann Lennon - One NEBOSH General Certificate (eLearning) course donated byWise Global Training Ltd


>>>>


Safety Photo


Yasmeen Hirani - One Essentials of H&S at Work (paperback) donated bySafetyphoto


>>>>


 


via Health and Safety for Beginners Prize Draw – NO Catch – NO Fee – It’s FREE!!.

Read more at www.healthandsafetytips.co.uk